The Frontend Interview Landscape
Interview Formats by Company
Each major tech company has a distinct frontend interview process. Knowing the format in advance lets you prepare strategically instead of generically.
Meta (Frontend Engineer)
Meta has a dedicated Frontend Engineer interview loop, separate from their general SWE track:
| Round | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter Screen | 30 min | Behavioral, role fit |
| Technical Phone Screen | 45 min | JavaScript coding, DOM manipulation |
| Onsite Round 1: Coding | 45 min | Vanilla JS problem — no frameworks allowed |
| Onsite Round 2: Coding | 45 min | Algorithmic or UI implementation from scratch |
| Onsite Round 3: Frontend System Design | 45 min | Design a news feed, autocomplete, or spreadsheet |
| Onsite Round 4: Behavioral | 45 min | Collaboration, conflict resolution, project impact |
Key Meta notes:
- The coding rounds test vanilla JavaScript, not React or any framework
- The system design round is frontend-specific — component architecture, state management, data flow, rendering performance
- Meta uses a hiring committee model — interviewers submit independent feedback and a separate committee makes the hire/no-hire decision
Google (Frontend / SWE)
Google's frontend process is less differentiated from general SWE than Meta's:
| Round | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter Screen | 30 min | Background, role expectations |
| Phone/Video Technical Screen | 45 min | Coding on shared editor (algorithms or frontend-specific) |
| Onsite Coding x 2-3 | 45 min each | Mix of algorithms/DSA and frontend-specific (DOM, CSS, JS) |
| Onsite Frontend System Design | 45 min | Frontend architecture with scalability considerations |
| Onsite Behavioral | 45 min | "Googleyness & Leadership" assessment |
Key Google notes:
- Google historically weights algorithms more heavily than Meta for frontend roles
- The hiring committee is separate from the interviewers — they review written feedback and decide
- Candidates can be "pooled" — approved by committee but waiting for a team match
- Some Google teams still run a generic SWE loop even for frontend candidates
Amazon (Frontend / SDE)
Amazon's process is unique because Leadership Principles (LPs) are evaluated in every single round:
| Round | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter Screen | 30 min | Background, LP alignment |
| Online Assessment | 60-90 min | Coding problems on HackerRank or Amazon's platform |
| Onsite Coding x 2 | 60 min each | Algorithmic + frontend-specific (15-20 min LP per round) |
| Onsite System Design | 60 min | Frontend or full-stack depending on team |
| Onsite Behavioral/LP | 60 min | Deep LP assessment (often a "Bar Raiser" round) |
Key Amazon notes:
- Every round starts with 15-20 minutes of behavioral/LP questions — this is not optional
- The 16 Leadership Principles (Customer Obsession, Ownership, Bias for Action, etc.) are the backbone of Amazon's hiring
- LP performance can override technical performance — a strong technical showing with weak LP signals can result in rejection
- Prepare 2-3 STAR stories per Leadership Principle — this is not an exaggeration
- The "Bar Raiser" is a specially trained interviewer from another team whose job is to maintain hiring standards
Apple
Apple is the most opaque of the major tech companies about their process:
| Round | Duration | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter Screen | 30 min | Background |
| Technical Phone Screen | 45-60 min | Team-specific coding |
| Onsite Coding x 2-3 | 45-60 min each | Practical, applied problems related to the team's product |
| Onsite System Design | 45-60 min | Frontend or full-stack |
| Onsite Behavioral x 1-2 | 45 min | Culture fit, attention to detail, craft |
| Manager Interview | 30-45 min | Hiring manager and sometimes skip-level |
Key Apple notes:
- The process is team-specific — the hiring manager has significant influence
- Apple values craft, attention to detail, and passion for user experience
- They ask about accessibility, performance optimization, and cross-browser compatibility more than other companies
- Questions may involve real-world scenarios relevant to the team's product (Safari, Maps, Music, etc.)
Startups
Startup interview processes are more varied but typically shorter:
| Format | Description | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Take-Home Assignment | Build a small React app or implement a feature | 2-8 hrs |
| Pair Programming | Build something collaboratively with an interviewer | 60-90 min |
| Portfolio Review | Deep-dive discussion of past projects and decisions | 45-60 min |
| System Design Lite | Informal whiteboard architecture discussion | 30-45 min |
| Paid Trial Day | Work on real codebase issues for 1-2 days | 1-2 days |
Key startup notes:
- Total process is typically 2-3 rounds (vs. FAANG's 5-6)
- Many startups are moving away from long take-homes toward shorter, timed exercises (2-4 hours max)
- Pair programming is increasingly popular — it tests collaboration and communication alongside coding
- Culture fit often matters more than algorithmic ability
Quick Comparison
| Company | Coding Emphasis | System Design | Behavioral | Total Rounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | Vanilla JS | Frontend-specific | Standard | 6 |
| Algorithms heavy | Frontend + scale | Googleyness | 6-7 | |
| Amazon | Mixed | Team-dependent | LP in every round | 5-6 |
| Apple | Applied/practical | Team-specific | Craft & detail | 5-7 |
| Startups | Practical/pair | Informal | Culture fit | 2-3 |
Next, we'll build your personalized 8-week study plan based on your target companies. :::