AI-Assisted Grading

The Grading Challenge

Grading is one of the most time-consuming aspects of teaching:

Task	Estimated Time per Assignment
Short answer (per student)	3-5 minutes
Essay (per student)	10-20 minutes
Long-form writing (per student)	20-30 minutes
Project rubric (per student)	15-25 minutes

For a class of 30 students:

• 30 essays × 15 min = 7.5 hours per assignment
• 5 major assignments per semester = 37.5 hours
• Multiple classes = 75+ hours per semester on grading alone

AI can significantly reduce this burden while potentially improving feedback quality.

What AI Can Do for Grading

Current AI Grading Capabilities:

Capability	Reliability	Best Use
Grammar/mechanics checking	High	First-pass editing
Rubric application (clear criteria)	Medium-High	Draft feedback
Content accuracy	Medium	Fact-checking support
Argument quality assessment	Medium	Second opinion
Creativity evaluation	Low	Not recommended
Effort/growth assessment	Low	Teacher judgment needed

What AI Can't Do:

• Understand student context (struggles, growth, effort)
• Assess authentic learning vs. copying
• Replace teacher judgment on complex work
• Provide the relational aspect of feedback

AI Grading Workflow

Step 1: Prepare Your Rubric Create a clear, specific rubric that AI can apply:

Criterion: Thesis Statement (0-4 points)
4 - Clear, arguable thesis that directly addresses the prompt
3 - Thesis present and related to prompt, but could be stronger
2 - Thesis is vague or doesn't fully address the prompt
1 - Thesis is unclear or missing
0 - No thesis present

The more specific your rubric, the more useful AI feedback will be.

Step 2: Use AI for First Pass Submit student work and rubric to AI tool for initial assessment:

Here is a student essay and my grading rubric.
Please provide:
1. Score for each rubric criterion with explanation
2. Specific strengths to highlight
3. Specific areas for improvement with examples
4. One actionable suggestion for revision

[Paste rubric]
[Paste student work]

Step 3: Review and Adjust

• Check AI scores against your judgment
• Verify factual claims in AI feedback
• Add personal context AI can't know
• Adjust tone for individual student

Step 4: Finalize Feedback

• Use AI as starting point, not final product
• Add teacher voice and relationship
• Include growth-oriented comments
• Connect to previous work and future goals

Tools for AI-Assisted Grading

MagicSchool AI - Feedback Generator:

1. Select "AI Feedback Generator" tool
2. Paste student writing
3. Specify grade level and focus areas
4. Generate feedback in seconds
5. Edit and personalize

Brisk Teaching - Google Docs Integration:

1. Install Brisk Chrome extension
2. Open student work in Google Docs
3. Highlight text for feedback
4. Brisk generates suggestions
5. Accept, modify, or reject

Gradescope (for STEM):

1. Upload assignment and rubric
2. AI groups similar answers
3. Grade one, apply to similar
4. Dramatically faster for large classes

Class Companion:

1. Designed specifically for writing feedback
2. Aligns to writing standards
3. Provides revision suggestions
4. Tracks student progress over time

Time Savings: Realistic Expectations

What Research Shows:

• First-pass grading: 40-60% time reduction
• Overall grading process: 20-40% time reduction (including review)
• Quality of feedback: Often improves with AI starting point

Why Not Higher Savings?

• Review time is essential
• Personalization takes time
• Complex assignments need human judgment
• Student relationships require teacher input

Realistic Scenario:

Step	Without AI	With AI
Read essay	5 min	5 min
Write feedback	10 min	3 min (review AI)
Score rubric	5 min	2 min (verify AI)
Total	20 min	10 min

Savings: 50% per essay, but still requires teacher engagement.

Best Practices for AI-Assisted Grading

Do:

• Use clear, specific rubrics
• Review all AI feedback before sharing
• Add personal context and encouragement
• Be transparent with students about AI assistance
• Use AI for formative feedback (revisions welcome)

Don't:

• Accept AI feedback uncritically
• Use AI for high-stakes summative assessment without review
• Rely on AI for detecting plagiarism/AI use (separate issue)
• Remove teacher presence from feedback
• Assume AI catches everything

Writing Effective AI Grading Prompts

Basic Prompt:

Grade this essay according to the rubric. Provide feedback.
[rubric] [essay]

Better Prompt:

You are an experienced [grade level] [subject] teacher
providing feedback on a student essay.

Using the rubric below, please:
1. Assign a score for each criterion (with brief justification)
2. Identify 2 specific strengths with examples from the text
3. Identify 2 specific areas for improvement with examples
4. Provide one actionable suggestion the student can use in revision
5. Write a brief encouraging summary (2-3 sentences)

Tone: Supportive but honest. Focus on growth.

Rubric:
[detailed rubric]

Student Essay:
[essay text]

Advanced Prompt (for revision-focused feedback):

This is a first draft. The student will have opportunity to revise.

Focus your feedback on:
- The 1-2 most impactful changes they could make
- Specific examples they can learn from
- Questions that prompt deeper thinking

Avoid:
- Line-editing grammar (they have tools for that)
- Overwhelming with too many comments
- Vague praise or criticism

[rubric] [essay]

Handling Edge Cases

What If AI Feedback Is Wrong?

• Common with factual claims - always verify
• Adjust and note for future prompts
• Use as learning moment: "AI suggested X, but actually Y"

What If AI Misses Something Important?

• Add teacher comments alongside AI feedback
• AI is a starting point, not comprehensive
• Your expertise catches what AI misses

What If Student Work Is AI-Generated?

• That's a separate issue (covered in Module 4)
• AI grading still applies to AI-written work
• Focus on learning outcomes, not just grading

Ethical Considerations

Transparency:

• Should students know AI assists grading?
• Consider: "I use AI tools to help generate initial feedback, which I then review and personalize for each student."

Fairness:

• AI may have biases in assessing writing style
• Review for consistent application across students
• Pay attention to feedback on ESL students' work

Privacy:

• Where does student work go when processed by AI?
• Check school policies on data handling
• Use school-approved tools when possible

Building Your AI Grading System

Week 1: Experiment

• Try one AI grading tool with low-stakes assignment
• Note time savings and feedback quality
• Identify what requires most editing

Week 2: Refine

• Adjust your prompts based on Week 1
• Develop rubrics that work well with AI
• Create templates for common feedback

Week 3: Systematize

• Establish consistent workflow
• Train yourself to review efficiently
• Set realistic expectations for time savings

Week 4: Evaluate

• Compare feedback quality to pre-AI
• Survey students on feedback usefulness
• Decide which assignments benefit most from AI

Key Takeaways

1. AI can reduce grading time by 20-50% for many assignments
2. Clear rubrics lead to better AI feedback
3. Always review AI-generated feedback before sharing
4. Add personal context that AI can't know
5. Use AI for formative feedback where revision is possible
6. Be transparent with students about AI assistance
7. AI is a tool, not a replacement for teacher judgment

:::