Working with AI Agents
The Agent Tools Landscape
2 min read
The AI agent ecosystem is evolving rapidly. Understanding the major players and their approaches helps you make informed decisions.
Foundation Model Providers
OpenAI
- Key products: GPT-4, ChatGPT, Agents SDK
- Agent approach: API-first, flexible integration
- Strength: Widely adopted, extensive documentation
- Best for: Custom enterprise solutions
Anthropic (Claude)
- Key products: Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5
- Agent approach: Safety-focused, constitutional AI
- Strength: Strong reasoning, long context windows
- Best for: Complex analysis, sensitive applications
- Key products: Gemini, Vertex AI
- Agent approach: Deep Google workspace integration
- Strength: Search, multimodal capabilities
- Best for: Organizations already in Google ecosystem
Agent Frameworks
LangChain
- What it is: Open-source framework for building LLM applications
- GitHub stars: 120,000+
- Strength: Extensive integrations, active community
- Best for: Developers wanting flexibility
CrewAI
- What it is: Framework for orchestrating multi-agent teams
- GitHub stars: 40,000+
- Strength: Easy multi-agent coordination
- Best for: Complex workflows with specialized agents
AutoGen (Microsoft)
- What it is: Framework for building multi-agent systems
- Strength: Enterprise integration, Azure synergy
- Best for: Microsoft-centric organizations
Connection Standards
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
A major development in December 2025: MCP was donated to the Agentic AI Foundation, establishing it as an open standard.
- What it does: Standardizes how agents connect to external tools and data
- Adoption: 10,000+ MCP servers available
- Impact: Agents can now use plug-and-play integrations
This is similar to how USB standardized hardware connections—MCP is standardizing AI agent connections.
Choosing Your Tools
Consider these factors:
| Factor | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Integration | What systems does it need to connect to? |
| Scale | How many users? How much volume? |
| Control | How much customization do you need? |
| Compliance | What regulatory requirements apply? |
| Budget | Total cost including development and operation? |
The Build vs. Buy Decision
Build (using frameworks):
- Maximum flexibility
- Higher initial investment
- Requires technical team
- Own the full stack
Buy (platform solutions):
- Faster deployment
- Ongoing subscription costs
- Limited customization
- Vendor dependency
Most organizations use a hybrid approach—buy for common use cases, build for competitive differentiators.
:::